Uber’s New PAC in New Jersey: Profit Over Passenger Safety
By Justin Drazin, UberHurtMe.com
Uber’s recent decision to launch a political action committee (PAC) in New Jersey, with plans to spend over $1 million to influence state policy, underscores a troubling pattern of prioritizing corporate interests over customer safety and accountability. Rather than addressing the pressing concerns surrounding passenger safety and driver accountability, Uber is channeling substantial resources into lobbying efforts aimed at reducing insurance costs for ride-share services. This move raises questions about the company’s commitment to the well-being of its users and the broader community.
Lobbying for Lower Insurance at the Expense of Consumer Protection
The PAC, named “A Fair and Affordable NJ,” is set to support candidates who advocate for lower insurance requirements for transportation network companies. Uber argues that current state-mandated insurance costs, which they claim amount to nearly 35% of the rider fare, make ride-sharing services less accessible. However, this stance overlooks the essential role comprehensive insurance plays in protecting passengers and ensuring that victims of accidents receive adequate compensation.
By focusing on reducing these protections, Uber appears to be sidestepping its responsibility to safeguard its customers.
This initiative is not an isolated instance of Uber’s attempts to influence policy in its favor. In 2015, the company spent over $159,000 on lobbying efforts in Trenton, primarily opposing legislation aimed at regulating its drivers. Such actions suggest a consistent strategy of resisting oversight and minimizing obligations that are designed to protect consumers. Instead of investing in measures to enhance safety and accountability, Uber’s focus on political maneuvering indicates a preference for profit over people.
Uber’s political approach to “making rideshare services more affordable” seems disingenuous, at best, especially when Uber’s CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi earned over $39 million in 2024, $15 million more than he did in 2023. Perhaps Uber’s motivation to curb insurance costs is actually derived from the company footing the insurance premiums for its drivers, who Uber claims are “independent contractors,” despite New Jersey and many other states auditing and fining Uber hundreds of millions of dollars for misclassifying their drivers.
New Jersey Lawmakers Must Stay Alert to Protecting Its Citizens
As Uber continues to expand its influence in New Jersey politics, it’s imperative for lawmakers and the public to scrutinize the company’s motives and advocate for policies that prioritize the safety and rights of passengers. Reducing insurance requirements may lower costs in the short term, but it could also leave riders vulnerable in the event of accidents. True accountability involves embracing regulations that protect consumers, not circumventing them through political spending.
Author Background: Justin Drazin recently launched UberHurtMe.com, a nationwide resource for victims involved in Uber and Lyft accidents.
